<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Right or Wrong? KTVZ Coughs Up Anonymous User Info</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bendtech.com/2010/01/right-or-wrong-ktvz-coughs-up-anonymous-user-info/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bendtech.com/2010/01/right-or-wrong-ktvz-coughs-up-anonymous-user-info/</link>
	<description>A Grassroots Experiment In Building Central Oregon&#039;s Tech Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 21:11:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Miller</title>
		<link>http://blog.bendtech.com/2010/01/right-or-wrong-ktvz-coughs-up-anonymous-user-info/comment-page-1/#comment-1480</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bendtech.com/?p=1789#comment-1480</guid>
		<description>As a cable operator, BendBroadband must protect its cable, telephone and Internet subscribers’ privacy in compliance with federal law … specifically the Federal Communications Act.   We have a role to “take such actions as are necessary to prevent unauthorized access to such information by a person other than the subscriber or cable operator.”  We take this role, in protecting customer privacy, very seriously.

Frank Miller
CTO / BendBroadband</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a cable operator, BendBroadband must protect its cable, telephone and Internet subscribers’ privacy in compliance with federal law … specifically the Federal Communications Act.   We have a role to “take such actions as are necessary to prevent unauthorized access to such information by a person other than the subscriber or cable operator.”  We take this role, in protecting customer privacy, very seriously.</p>
<p>Frank Miller<br />
CTO / BendBroadband</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Owens</title>
		<link>http://blog.bendtech.com/2010/01/right-or-wrong-ktvz-coughs-up-anonymous-user-info/comment-page-1/#comment-1479</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bendtech.com/?p=1789#comment-1479</guid>
		<description>Which ISP indeed...

Under an official subpoena any ISP (with less than Comcast&#039;s legal department) would be hard pressed to not &#039;fess up.

I agree the ISP folded, while they are the in the best position to fight.  What I do not agree with is the notion that anything you attach to an IP address is private.  It&#039;s immediately anonymous, but don&#039;t assume that a 32-bit number will never be attached to your name.  Libel is a crime, IP/billing info is evidence.  

An ISP&#039;s responsibility is to protect the privacy of it&#039;s users, until they violate AUPs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which ISP indeed&#8230;</p>
<p>Under an official subpoena any ISP (with less than Comcast&#8217;s legal department) would be hard pressed to not &#8216;fess up.</p>
<p>I agree the ISP folded, while they are the in the best position to fight.  What I do not agree with is the notion that anything you attach to an IP address is private.  It&#8217;s immediately anonymous, but don&#8217;t assume that a 32-bit number will never be attached to your name.  Libel is a crime, IP/billing info is evidence.  </p>
<p>An ISP&#8217;s responsibility is to protect the privacy of it&#8217;s users, until they violate AUPs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

