Archive for the ‘government’ Category

Sunriver responds to Google Fiber RFI

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

Last Friday, Sunriver joined an estimated 1,100 other cities and communities in responding to Google’s Fiber for Communities Request for Information (RFI). By now everyone has probably heard of the “Google fiber” initiative, with cities like Topeka, Kansas changing their name to Google, Kansas (if only symbolically), and mayors doing stunts like jumping into nearly frozen lakes in front of rolling YouTube cameras – all in hopes of gaining Google’s attention.

Sunriver took what we think is the “high road” – preferring to make a business case to Google. Our major selling points are:

  1. Reach – for the cost of wiring 6,000 homes, Google would expose the benefits of gigabit fiber to over 1 million visitors per year. These visitors come for holidays and vacations, as well as business meetings and conferences based at Sunriver Resort. Compared to Topeka – Sunriver can reach 10 times the people at 1/10 the cost.
  2. Shovel Ready – Sunriver is governed by an owner’s association (SROA) and owns and controls its own roads and utility rights of way. We are served by Chambers Cable – and Sunriver is the only cable system Chambers owns. The SROA board voted unanimously to approve the Google fiber project, and we have gotten enthusiastic support as well from Chambers Cable. Both entities are ready to “dig for Google” starting as soon as possible. We also have fiber to the node throughout the Chambers Cable system, and over 90 miles of conduit to over half of the homes.
  3. Education – Sunriver is served by Three Rivers Elementary – a K-8 school in the Bend Lapine School District. Three Rivers has the slowest Internet connection in the district. In addition, over 62% of its students qualify for the federal free or reduced cost lunch program due to their family economic status. We are over 20 miles from the nearest higher education facility and high school students are bused 20 miles to Bend.
  4. Telemedicine – Most medical services are over 20 miles away in Bend. Many of our retired residents end up moving to Bend as they grown older and need more medical care. Google’s RFI envisions “ sitting in a rural health clinic, streaming three-dimensional medical imaging over the web and discussing a unique condition with a specialist”.
  5. Impact – Portland, Seattle and similar large cities have all applied as well. As many of us know, these are excellent cities and great places to “be from”. The impact of Google’s project on Sunriver will be immediate, large and very measurable.  The impact on larger cities will be much less immediate, obvious or measurable.
  6. Proximity to Google HQ – Sunriver has its own airport – which can support both business jets and turboprops. We are just an hour flight by jet from Google’s Mountain View headquarters.

Finally, TechSpace Bend came to our help and illustrated our need last week. We produced a 10 minute HD YouTube video as requested by Google, and I needed to upload the final cut to YouTube from Sunriver.  I have a Qwest 6 mbps connection, but was getting horrible upload speeds that caused timeouts each time I tried. Thanks to Robert Kieffer I was able to come in to TechSpace and in about 20 minutes my upload was done! I am planning to sign up for TechSpace, and hope to be able to open the Sunriver branch of TechSpace later this year – when we get our Google Fiber of course!

Broadband – A Government-Provided Utility?

Friday, April 24th, 2009

IndyWeek.com has a great article about the city of Wilson, North Carolina and their efforts to develop a publicly owned broadband network.  Wilson isn’t the first city to do something like this; in fact, as of April 2008, there were 44 government/municipal ISPs in the U.S. serving 60 cities.  But what makes this interesting is how commercial ISPs – Time Warner Cable and Embarq DSL specifically – are reacting to this government-sponsored one-upsmanship.  They’ve pushed legislation before the state government that effectively prohibits government-owned competition (not in so many words, but that’s the net effect.)  But I won’t bore you with the details that are available elsewhere.

As you can imagine, this is the gateway to any number of intriguing discussions.  Should Bend undertake a similar effort? Would cheap, government owned broadband help attract businesses to the area?  Is broadband service really a utility?  If so, how does it compare to other local utilities, such as Water and Sewer (hmm… flooding issues, anyone?).  I could go on and on.  But for now, let me just throw down a few bullets:

  • Wilson’s fiber network is funded with $28M in bonds
  • Wilcon population is 50K (compared to Bend’s 80K)
  • The “Fiber to the Home” council website has some great resources and whitepapers. This whitepaper [PDF] in particular is worth a read.  In addition to the data on how many municipal ISPs there are, the paper includes these tidbits:
    • No municipal ISP has yet “failed”
    • Average “take rate” (%’age of potential subscribers that sign up) is 54%
    • Most municipal business plans only require a 30-40% take rate to be profitable.
    • Many municipalities report increases in home-based businesses, and increased attractiveness to businesses considering relocating to the area.
  • Our nearest public network is the one in Ashland (I think?)

One thing I don’t have a good feel for is what the interest for something like this would be locally.  Bend Broadband has (IMHO) always been one of the better ISPs in the nation.  Do we really need something like this?  If so why?  What would be the most relevant issues?  (And what would it mean to have an ISP that was subject to the whim and mercy of voters???)

Pardon My Gas

Monday, January 5th, 2009
protogas

Prototype Mileage Unit Display

Oregon is making national headlines with Governor Kulongoski’s proposed “mileage tax”.  Many people are criticizing this as, “another idea cooked up by those Oregon crackpots”, and I have to confess this was my first reaction as well.  But media coverage and the surrounding commentary has been noticeably light on substance.   Given the extremely technical nature of the system required to collect this mileage tax, it seemed like a slightly more in-depth analysis might be an appropriate topic for this blog.

(BTW, if you’re not familiar with the mileage tax debate, this Seattle Times article is as good a starting point as any)

So here goes … (more…)